Transcendence Port to Linux and Mac

New releases and announcements from George and the staff.
Post Reply
User avatar
GambitDash
Developer
Developer
Posts: 81
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 7:01 am

Glad to hear that! Tell your friends! Heck, tell your enemies! :)
CFG
Militia Lieutenant
Militia Lieutenant
Posts: 163
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 3:05 pm
Location: Germany, NW

Its gotten a bit quiet - not only in this thread, but in the forum in general...

I know we're all waiting for 1.0 ;) but is there any progress on the remaining (minor) graphical issues? Id especially like the 'black = transparent' thing being fixed.
User avatar
alterecco
Fleet Officer
Fleet Officer
Posts: 1658
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 3:08 am
Location: Previously enslaved by the Iocrym

I was wondering if it could be possible to provide a version of the executable that runs in debug mode by default. It would be mighty mainly for us many modders using linux. I do run Transcendence through wine also, but the fonts in the console are all messed up (ie. not really usable).

I hope it would be an easier thing to accomplish than having to enable the flags at runtime. Pretty please? :D
User avatar
GambitDash
Developer
Developer
Posts: 81
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 7:01 am

Making the console work again is actually my only major remaining task, besides the occasional color matching issue. I'm hoping to get more time soon, really to support you happy modders :)
Retroactive
Commonwealth Pilot
Commonwealth Pilot
Posts: 66
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 12:45 am

I have a Mac running 10.5 and could probably compile a Mac version with a little hand-holding. Can I help in any way?
User avatar
GambitDash
Developer
Developer
Posts: 81
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 7:01 am

Okay, second-to-last major task :)

My wife just got a macbook, so at least I have a machine available. It shouldn't be toooo much work to do the port to at least a comparable level of functionality, just a matter of prying it out of her hands for long enough :)

Thanks, though!
--G
Nate879
Anarchist
Anarchist
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:11 pm
Location: Eridani

Why does this version of Transcendence use so much memory? On my computer, it takes up hundreds of MB. My computer has only 256 MB of RAM, and I'm planning to upgrade. Until then, is there any way to reduce its memory usage?

[Edit] I posted this here instead of the bugs forum because this only happens with the port to Linux. The Windows version can be run with Wine, and takes only ~130 MB. Unfortunately, that version is very slow when I run it with Wine.
Last edited by Nate879 on Thu Jul 16, 2009 4:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
schilcote
Militia Captain
Militia Captain
Posts: 726
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 7:22 pm

Either that post came from the distant past, or you have one REALLY outdated computer. I don't thinky you can buy 256M of ram. The smallest stick I've seen is 512, and the largest is 4GB per stick.

It's an old rule: don't complain about performance when you're using a crappy computer.
[schilcote] It doesn't have to be good, it just has to not be "wow is that the only thing you could think of" bad
User avatar
Aury
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 5421
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 1:10 am
Location: Somewhere in the Frontier on a Hycrotan station, working on new ships.

look at the post date :shock:

Runs fine on my older laptop (5-6 years old?), and that has a measly 256mb or ram too. :shock:
(shpOrder gPlayership 'barrelRoll)
(plySetGenome gPlayer (list 'Varalyn 'nonBinary))
Homelab Servers: Xeon Silver 4110, 16GB | Via Quadcore C4650, 16GB | Athlon 200GE, 8GB | i7 7800X, 32GB | Threadripper 1950X, 32GB | Atom x5 8350, 4GB | Opteron 8174, 16GB | Xeon E5 2620 v3, 8GB | 2x Xeon Silver 4116, 96GB, 2x 1080ti | i7 8700, 32GB, 6500XT
Workstations & Render machines: Threadripper 3990X, 128GB, 6900XT | Threadripper 2990WX, 32GB, 1080ti | Xeon Platinum 8173M, 48GB, 1070ti | R9 3900X, 16GB, Vega64 | 2x E5 2430L v2, 24GB, 970 | R7 3700X, 32GB, A6000
Gaming Systems: R9 5950X, 32GB, 6700XT
Office Systems: Xeon 5318Y, 256GB, A4000
Misc Systems: R5 3500U, 20GB | R5 2400G, 16GB | i5 7640X, 16GB, Vega56 | E5 2620, 8GB, R5 260 | P4 1.8ghz, 0.75GB, Voodoo 5 5500 | Athlon 64 x2 4400+, 1.5GB, FX 5800 Ultra | Pentium D 3.2ghz, 4GB, 7600gt | Celeron g460, 8GB, 730gt | 2x Athlon FX 74, 8GB, 8800gts 512 | FX 9590, 16GB, R9 295x2 | E350, 8GB | Phenom X4 2.6ghz, 16GB, 8800gt | random core2 duo/atom/i5/i7 laptops
Nate879
Anarchist
Anarchist
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:11 pm
Location: Eridani

Either that post came from the distant past, or you have one REALLY outdated computer. I don't thinky you can buy 256M of ram. The smallest stick I've seen is 512, and the largest is 4GB per stick.
Yes, I know the computer is old. That's why I want to upgrade the RAM! But 256 MB is sufficient for almost every program I use. I can only think of two programs that use that much RAM: Transcendence and the C++ compiler.

I'm using Linux, and Linux doesn't require a powerful computer. For example, I'm using less than 8 GB of hard drive space, and when I first installed Linux I used less than 4.
User avatar
GambitDash
Developer
Developer
Posts: 81
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 7:01 am

Hm, last time I checked it used about the same amount of RAM as the windows version, which was around 130MB either way. Do you have any numbers for further details?
User avatar
Aeonic
Militia Commander
Militia Commander
Posts: 469
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 1:05 am
Location: Designing his dream ship.

I had 256 RAM until just a few months ago when I upgraded to four sticks of 512 (courtesy of yard sale). The only thing it has helped me with is handling those 16000x400 pre-shrunk ship animation graphics. :P Now I can have a bunch of 'em open at once!
Last Cause Of Death: Destroyed by Karl Svalbard's last Lucifer missile, right after I blew him up. And the crowd cheers.
Image
schilcote
Militia Captain
Militia Captain
Posts: 726
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 7:22 pm

Darn, I didn't realise how fortunate I was to have 3 GB of ram and 500 GB of HD...
[schilcote] It doesn't have to be good, it just has to not be "wow is that the only thing you could think of" bad
Nate879
Anarchist
Anarchist
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:11 pm
Location: Eridani

GambitDash wrote:Hm, last time I checked it used about the same amount of RAM as the windows version, which was around 130MB either way. Do you have any numbers for further details?
After checking both versions again, it appears that the Linux version uses 180MB while starting up, then lowers to around 130. But when I play the game for a long time, memory usage gradually increases (I haven't tried that with the Windows version). This causes it to use a large amount of swap space.

Transcendence also takes a long time to start up. Could this use of swap space cause that?
schilcote
Militia Captain
Militia Captain
Posts: 726
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 7:22 pm

Well, how long are we talking? If you have a large number of mods, then that will definitely slow it down a bit, but then again, I have almost every working mod available for download, and external XMLs (no transcendence.tld or whatever it is) and I only have to wait for a minute for Transcendence to start.
[schilcote] It doesn't have to be good, it just has to not be "wow is that the only thing you could think of" bad
Post Reply