Suggestion & Brainstorm: Illegal Weapons

Post ideas & suggestions you have pertaining to the game here.
User avatar
Fleet Officer
Fleet Officer
Posts: 1452
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2014 10:17 pm

Tue Aug 04, 2015 3:17 pm

Atarlost wrote:
JohnBWatson wrote:
Atarlost wrote:Persistent negative luck feedback would wreck the game experience. You'd lose the sense of discovery that's key to roguelikes because your long term outcomes would cease to be random.
Mathematically, it would come to a balance over time, as low luck would lead to outcomes that increase future luck.
That's precisely why it's not desirable. Future outcomes become weighted and that makes the game less interesting. The lure of a potential good run is a major part of what keeps people playing roguelikes.
A good run would still be possible, just not easily save - scummable. A run where every plot - related factor is on the player's side is likely to have a greater number of harder enemies to counterbalance that.

I agree. I dislike rubber-band or dynamic difficulty.
That's not in the slightest what I was suggesting. Dynamic difficulty punishes the player for doing well. I suggested weighting rolls on game start based on the outcome of previous rolls to make difficulty more balanced across games.

Come to think of it, this could also work as some manner of challenge mode unlocked after a permadeath run. Make 'enemies spawned(quantity)', 'enemies spawned(difficulty)', 'friendlies spawned', 'loot provided', and 'misc. rolls' modify themselves based on an adjustable slider from their initial point towards the more difficult extreme, and provide score multipliers for the player based on this. Increasing the first makes enemies more likely to spawn and increases the frequency of hostile random encounters. Increasing the second makes higher - grade hostiles spawn earlier on, for example, the Urak fortresses could begin appearing in the New Beyond instead, as could the Heliotropes. Lowering the third would reduce the number of friendly stations spawned across Human Space, lowering the fourth would decrease the cash value of loot per station, and lowering the fifth would make things like getting busted by the police more likely.

It'd add replayability, and give people from earlier versions some nostalgia by letting them meet the Heliotropes back in an area where their weapons were actually relevant.

Even excluding mods, standard game has waste cannon. A lucky player could get one in the first system, and a less lucky player can still make one at the Tinkers before St. K's sometimes. Normally, when player can install a waste cannon past St. K's, it is good solely for the radiation effect (which is very useful against Ferian miners and some enemies). Waste cannon would be very strong before St. K's because it has above average DPS for a level 4 blast weapon, and it is an excellent screen against incoming enemy fire.
I think the waste cannon ought to be better balanced as a whole. A major aspect of this is fixing the AI so that irradiated, petra'd, and podded ships go home to their stations to get fixed up. This would also make it more balanced to allow the player to install one early on.

User avatar
Militia Commander
Militia Commander
Posts: 362
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 3:10 pm
Location: Deep dark space/Indonesia

Thu Aug 06, 2015 2:59 am

What about "Infector Cannon" (Particle)? Low damage, cannot penerate shield but have chance 25% draining 5% your fuel per attack (Above 250MW doesn't effect). Let Heliotrope Colony have this weapon (because they are specialized about Fuel), and install it in their base.
Download Transcendence mods from Reinvented Workbench Project!
Semesta I.G.C v1.37
Great corporate that feature a new items and challenges!
YourCORP v1.16
Build your very own corporation!
Trade Item Extension v1.15
New misc items, foods and resources!
StrongBox v1.4
Open it up to get a random equipments!
Flare Weapons v1.6
New weapons that have very unique abilities!
Click this link!

Post Reply