How very Soylent Green of you...ThorWarriorX wrote:Longzhu spheres are made of human souls!

In space? Next to that big flaming thing putting out more energy than you could ever use? Planetside, yeah, but machines don't sleep, complain, or try to escape. I'm not sure there's a whole lot to do in space for a slave.Slaves are cheaper to power than robots. Just throw them some protein and carb goo with a bit of water and put em to work.
They are making them suffer, there is no better raw material for the longzhus than tormented souls, that's why they keep them for so long in the slave camps.OddBob wrote:I think the Sung are, you know, selling the slaves.
Antimatter?But I still think they are human souls... What could possibly power a weapon that could kill Iocryms? George, is my silly thought correct? xD?
The Game wrote:"Longzhu spheres are antimatter containment vessels used by the Sung Slavers as power sources."
Explain to me exactly how one does this so that I may do it at home and maybe it'll make sense. However, using 'souls', objects not actually known to exist, and when said to, are not even tangible, let alone providing any energy, I'd say is probably inferior to antimatter, a tangible (I wouldn't, though,You know, there are two things called transformation and willpower. Put these things along with human suffering, and PIMBA! You have a whole new and powerful destructive force.
It's true that 'souls' are not actually known to exist. But 'consciousness' is something that exists. Nobody knows whether consciousness is a physical phenomenon or an emergent property of a certain kind of self-knowing intelligence.OddBob wrote:However, using 'souls', objects not actually known to exist, and when said to, are not even tangible, let alone providing any energy, I'd say is probably inferior to antimatter, a tangible (I wouldn't, though,), real thing with a guarantee of a lot of energy with a simple bit of ordinary matter.
Not a fan of Schrodinger's eponymus cat then?Under certain interpretations of QM (though not mine) the quantum wave collapses only when 'observed' by a conscious entity.
I have no problem with the idea that quantum indeterminancy can apply to cats as well as protons. But I don't believe that the "observer" that causes the wavefunction to collapse has to be a conscious entity. I believe that any measurement, conscious or mechanical, would cause the cat to be in a determined state (dead or alive).the_holy_thom wrote:Not a fan of Schrodinger's eponymus cat then?